Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chris Clark" data-source="post: 71893" data-attributes="member: 2763"><p>Re: another live recording</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is a concept I hadn't thought of, but would definitely work for my purposes where we use over 4 different stereo sources on a regular basis. Using 4 faders on two layers would definitely be handier than losing a full 8 on one; The ability to control those channels from both layers is another plus with this scenario without being forced to use up my DCAs (or always having to be on the DCA layer). It would be no different than current analog mixers that already have stereo input pairs combined to one fader; and they would show up on both layers. Consider myself +1'd for this wishlist.</p><p></p><p>An alternative to this to both alleviate the fighting fader syndrome and reduce the number of faders required for stereo inputs would be simply the ability to combine two physical inputs onto a single fader as a stereo pair. Lets admit it, if you have a truly stereo pair, how often do you find yourself wanting to adjust each channel seperately? I realize this is the point of Linking channels, but why make it take up two faders? Why not the ability to combine those not only as vertical links as Karl suggested, but taking it a step further and also allowing those to be linked onto a single fader? As I said above, many analog mixers nowadays already do this with stereo paired inputs and the ability to move these around on a digital mixer would make it even handier.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chris Clark, post: 71893, member: 2763"] Re: another live recording This is a concept I hadn't thought of, but would definitely work for my purposes where we use over 4 different stereo sources on a regular basis. Using 4 faders on two layers would definitely be handier than losing a full 8 on one; The ability to control those channels from both layers is another plus with this scenario without being forced to use up my DCAs (or always having to be on the DCA layer). It would be no different than current analog mixers that already have stereo input pairs combined to one fader; and they would show up on both layers. Consider myself +1'd for this wishlist. An alternative to this to both alleviate the fighting fader syndrome and reduce the number of faders required for stereo inputs would be simply the ability to combine two physical inputs onto a single fader as a stereo pair. Lets admit it, if you have a truly stereo pair, how often do you find yourself wanting to adjust each channel seperately? I realize this is the point of Linking channels, but why make it take up two faders? Why not the ability to combine those not only as vertical links as Karl suggested, but taking it a step further and also allowing those to be linked onto a single fader? As I said above, many analog mixers nowadays already do this with stereo paired inputs and the ability to move these around on a digital mixer would make it even handier. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!