Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Robert Lofgren" data-source="post: 72741" data-attributes="member: 2447"><p>Re: X32 sounds harsh?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sounds good to hear that my hearing isn't at loss (yet).</p><p></p><p>As I said, this wasn't the first time I've heard this comment so it made me begin to wonder. The only common denominator is that none of the posters claiming this owned a x32 and had only used it for a quick run-down.</p><p></p><p>I would also first suspect workflow differences and/or location setup tuned for/with the other components.</p><p></p><p>As someone else noted, why mention 101dB SPL when talking about a mixer. And why did the writer of this specific article I linked try to make the foh <u>mix</u> sound good by tweaking the geq, which I assume was inserted on the mains? That would not be the first thing on my list to do in a situation like that...</p><p></p><p>While on a somewhat related subject. Do most of you x32-tweakers prefer the vintage or the normal parametric eq in general?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Robert Lofgren, post: 72741, member: 2447"] Re: X32 sounds harsh? Sounds good to hear that my hearing isn't at loss (yet). As I said, this wasn't the first time I've heard this comment so it made me begin to wonder. The only common denominator is that none of the posters claiming this owned a x32 and had only used it for a quick run-down. I would also first suspect workflow differences and/or location setup tuned for/with the other components. As someone else noted, why mention 101dB SPL when talking about a mixer. And why did the writer of this specific article I linked try to make the foh [U]mix[/U] sound good by tweaking the geq, which I assume was inserted on the mains? That would not be the first thing on my list to do in a situation like that... While on a somewhat related subject. Do most of you x32-tweakers prefer the vintage or the normal parametric eq in general? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!