Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kevin Wright" data-source="post: 73080" data-attributes="member: 2727">Re: Inputs - Possible feature requestHi Nick,Thanks for the quick reply. Funny, I saw the &quot;Local 1-4&quot; option for Aux ins experimenting with the XControl software after I posted my message and figured that might solve the particular example I gave, so that is certainly helpful. But I would still be interested in knowing why the sources are limited to 32 (plus 4 for the assignable Auxes, of course) and not some higher multiple like 48 or 64, which could then allow greater flexibility when assigning specific sources to individual channels. Behringer developers are probably the only ones who could answer that question.I guess the ultimate flexibility would be the ability to assign any input to any channel (e.g., assign AES-A17 to ch. 1, AES-B32 to ch.2, AES-A41 to ch.3, Local 9 to ch.4, etc. similar to the Tascam DM paradigm). I recognize that is not the X32 architecture and that may be part of what keeps the X32 simple to use and cost less.Anyway, I guess I can experiment a bit more directly once I get my hands on my new board tomorrow. (Yeah!!) Not anticipating getting much sleep for the next couple of days...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kevin Wright, post: 73080, member: 2727"] Re: Inputs - Possible feature request Hi Nick, Thanks for the quick reply. Funny, I saw the "Local 1-4" option for Aux ins experimenting with the XControl software [U]after[/U] I posted my message and figured that might solve the particular example I gave, so that is certainly helpful. But I would still be interested in knowing why the sources are limited to 32 (plus 4 for the assignable Auxes, of course) and not some higher multiple like 48 or 64, which could then allow greater flexibility when assigning specific sources to individual channels. Behringer developers are probably the only ones who could answer that question. I guess the ultimate flexibility would be the ability to assign [U]any[/U] input to [U]any[/U] channel (e.g., assign AES-A17 to ch. 1, AES-B32 to ch.2, AES-A41 to ch.3, Local 9 to ch.4, etc. similar to the Tascam DM paradigm). I recognize that is not the X32 architecture and that may be part of what keeps the X32 simple to use and cost less. Anyway, I guess I can experiment a bit more directly once I get my hands on my new board tomorrow. (Yeah!!) Not anticipating getting much sleep for the next couple of days... [/QUOTE]

Verification