Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Juergen Riemann" data-source="post: 74476" data-attributes="member: 1871"><p>Re: X32 Discussion</p><p></p><p>I completely agree with you Jon and it greatly upsets me. Same what presonus did before with posting fake messages on Gearslutz and they got cought.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.gearslutz.com/board/remote-possibilities-acoustic-music-location-recording/552039-behringer-x32-13.html" target="_blank">Behringer X32 - Page 13 - Gearslutz.com</a></p><p></p><p>Mtucker233,</p><p></p><p>Interesting comments and totally inconsistent with the findings of the <a href="http://forums.prosoundweb.com/index.php/topic,139651.0.html" target="_blank">ProsoundWeb shootout </a>that was just held. Seems like some of the most credible names in Pro Audio and production, with thousands of shows and recordings behind them, placed the X32 FIRST and the PreSonus LAST in a comparison of sound quality. Are you sure you don't work for PreSonus?</p><p></p><p>I noticed that you just joined these forums on Aug 27th and have made 6 posts during that time, most of them in this <a href="http://www.gearslutz.com/board/so-much-gear-so-little-time/758134-inspiration-vs-quality-x32-vs-api.html" target="_blank">thread</a>. All your comments seem very "on message" as they say: </p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>#4</strong> - <em>I just AB'd the X32 and the Presonus digital and the mic pres on the Presonus were far better. I mean I have heard how Midas built those mic pres but they sounded thine and harsh. The Presonus was warm and full. The x32 was better in functionality but I would have to go for the mic pres ahead of everything else. Remember everything goes through those mic pres.</em></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>#7 </strong>- <em>If the mic pre is an important part of your console of choice get a salesman to run the test on your own. Your ears will not lie. All 3 salesman and 4 customers agreed hands down.</em></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>#10</strong> - <em>Your ears and your customers have to live with what you choose in this line of work and play so what you hear is key...Check the mic pres they are key not the stereo return the mic pres and do it with your ears. You'll be glad you did.</em></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>#13</strong> - <em>Our eyes were enamoured but our ears wouldn't let us do it. Also, fat and warm is an industry standard most mic pres are going for. What we heard made us wait though. This is the X32's first outing. They can do better on the mic pre.</em></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>#17</strong> - <em>That name is a big deal when it comes to mic pres. You would have a hard time making something sound bad through a Midas console primarily because of the mic pres. If that's the name backing the X32's mic pres and you are dropping that name as bragging rights then it should be outstanding.</em></li> </ul><p></p><p>Add in the post in this thread that I quoted in reply to and that's 6 posts in just a couple of days, all saying the exact same thing. </p><p></p><p>We're happy to provide additional information, answers, and other forms of help to everyone in the audio community who has questions or concerns, and we value and respect differences of opinion. However, it's becoming very difficult to view your comments as being genuine and credible in nature.</p><p></p><p>Mike</p><p>MUSIC Group </p><p></p><p></p><p>We should post on their youtube videos and correct the facts, but it would not surprise me if Presonus will just remove our comments.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Juergen Riemann, post: 74476, member: 1871"] Re: X32 Discussion I completely agree with you Jon and it greatly upsets me. Same what presonus did before with posting fake messages on Gearslutz and they got cought. [URL="http://www.gearslutz.com/board/remote-possibilities-acoustic-music-location-recording/552039-behringer-x32-13.html"]Behringer X32 - Page 13 - Gearslutz.com[/URL] Mtucker233, Interesting comments and totally inconsistent with the findings of the [URL="http://forums.prosoundweb.com/index.php/topic,139651.0.html"]ProsoundWeb shootout [/URL]that was just held. Seems like some of the most credible names in Pro Audio and production, with thousands of shows and recordings behind them, placed the X32 FIRST and the PreSonus LAST in a comparison of sound quality. Are you sure you don't work for PreSonus? I noticed that you just joined these forums on Aug 27th and have made 6 posts during that time, most of them in this [URL="http://www.gearslutz.com/board/so-much-gear-so-little-time/758134-inspiration-vs-quality-x32-vs-api.html"]thread[/URL]. All your comments seem very "on message" as they say: [LIST] [*][B]#4[/B] - [I]I just AB'd the X32 and the Presonus digital and the mic pres on the Presonus were far better. I mean I have heard how Midas built those mic pres but they sounded thine and harsh. The Presonus was warm and full. The x32 was better in functionality but I would have to go for the mic pres ahead of everything else. Remember everything goes through those mic pres.[/I] [*][B]#7 [/B]- [I]If the mic pre is an important part of your console of choice get a salesman to run the test on your own. Your ears will not lie. All 3 salesman and 4 customers agreed hands down.[/I] [*][B]#10[/B] - [I]Your ears and your customers have to live with what you choose in this line of work and play so what you hear is key...Check the mic pres they are key not the stereo return the mic pres and do it with your ears. You'll be glad you did.[/I] [*][B]#13[/B] - [I]Our eyes were enamoured but our ears wouldn't let us do it. Also, fat and warm is an industry standard most mic pres are going for. What we heard made us wait though. This is the X32's first outing. They can do better on the mic pre.[/I] [*][B]#17[/B] - [I]That name is a big deal when it comes to mic pres. You would have a hard time making something sound bad through a Midas console primarily because of the mic pres. If that's the name backing the X32's mic pres and you are dropping that name as bragging rights then it should be outstanding.[/I] [/LIST] Add in the post in this thread that I quoted in reply to and that's 6 posts in just a couple of days, all saying the exact same thing. We're happy to provide additional information, answers, and other forms of help to everyone in the audio community who has questions or concerns, and we value and respect differences of opinion. However, it's becoming very difficult to view your comments as being genuine and credible in nature. Mike MUSIC Group We should post on their youtube videos and correct the facts, but it would not surprise me if Presonus will just remove our comments. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!
