Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tamas Tako" data-source="post: 75451" data-attributes="member: 2591">Re: XiQ appWell, this may seems to be obvious if you think about it in a way analogue consoles work....IF the master ist at 0 dB and the sends are so hot, that the sum of them are Overloading the corresponding MIX bus,lovering the MASTER fader doesn&#039;t helps you get rid of the clipping....However It can be implemented on the digital domain - if floating point math is used - quite differently as well.That said, if you decrease the level at the MIXbus Master fader, you can also avoid digital clipping that way, and not only withdecreasing all Send levels... Of course this highly depends on the way the engineers wrote the code, so maybe somebody will chime in to clarify this... OTOH we can test it on the console also quite easily <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :-)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" />Cheers,Tamas</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tamas Tako, post: 75451, member: 2591"] Re: XiQ app Well, this may seems to be obvious if you think about it in a way analogue consoles work.... IF the master ist at 0 dB and the sends are so hot, that the sum of them are Overloading the corresponding MIX bus, lovering the MASTER fader doesn't helps you get rid of the clipping.... However It can be implemented on the digital domain - if floating point math is used - quite differently as well. That said, if you decrease the level at the MIXbus Master fader, you can also avoid digital clipping that way, and not only with decreasing all Send levels... Of course this highly depends on the way the engineers wrote the code, so maybe somebody will chime in to clarify this... OTOH we can test it on the console also quite easily :-) Cheers, Tamas [/QUOTE]

Verification