Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tim Ringgenberg" data-source="post: 76069" data-attributes="member: 2451">Re: X32 DiscussionAfter reading that supposed review of the X32 I almost can&#039;t believe that it was real. The Presonus also has 16 buss&#039;s total. And only two effect buss&#039;s. I have never used only two buss&#039;s for effects. Many digital effects cut out during setting changes as well. This is nothing new. The Presonus does not have DCA&#039;s and he complains that they are level only. He has never used an analog desk with VCA&#039;s. And I wonder how many Pro digital desks he has actually used.I have been on the Yamaha&#039;s, Midas&#039;s, and even tried the new Roland&#039;s.He says he doesn&#039;t miss the flying faders because he only has 24 channels. He doesn&#039;t get the advantage of recalling all of the channel parameters during a recall. He does mention the fact that x32 also recalls the preamp settings but I don&#039;t think the preamps in the Presonus sound better than the 32&#039;s and I have been using Presonus preamps with another of my digital boards. The reverbs in the x32 sound pretty damn good. Not like my high end lexicons but for live I can live with the difference. They sound better than the ones that came in the Midas Pro 2. He also talks about getting the Xcontrol to work with the board. Set the address and go. I am glad I purchased the X32. I have been using it for FOH, monitors, as well as a recording desk and find it so easy to go from one use to another. Just hit scene recall and it is all there. And with sends on faders setting mixes is a breeze. Also like the solo follows select option. Great when mixing monitors. I just can&#039;t believe that was a real review and I think some of his reasoning shows how flawed it is. As for the recording software that comes with the Presonus, how does it compare to DAWS like Logic, Nuendo, Cubase, and Protools.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tim Ringgenberg, post: 76069, member: 2451"] Re: X32 Discussion After reading that supposed review of the X32 I almost can't believe that it was real. The Presonus also has 16 buss's total. And only two effect buss's. I have never used only two buss's for effects. Many digital effects cut out during setting changes as well. This is nothing new. The Presonus does not have DCA's and he complains that they are level only. He has never used an analog desk with VCA's. And I wonder how many Pro digital desks he has actually used.I have been on the Yamaha's, Midas's, and even tried the new Roland's.He says he doesn't miss the flying faders because he only has 24 channels. He doesn't get the advantage of recalling all of the channel parameters during a recall. He does mention the fact that x32 also recalls the preamp settings but I don't think the preamps in the Presonus sound better than the 32's and I have been using Presonus preamps with another of my digital boards. The reverbs in the x32 sound pretty damn good. Not like my high end lexicons but for live I can live with the difference. They sound better than the ones that came in the Midas Pro 2. He also talks about getting the Xcontrol to work with the board. Set the address and go. I am glad I purchased the X32. I have been using it for FOH, monitors, as well as a recording desk and find it so easy to go from one use to another. Just hit scene recall and it is all there. And with sends on faders setting mixes is a breeze. Also like the solo follows select option. Great when mixing monitors. I just can't believe that was a real review and I think some of his reasoning shows how flawed it is. As for the recording software that comes with the Presonus, how does it compare to DAWS like Logic, Nuendo, Cubase, and Protools. [/QUOTE]

Verification