Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="James Drake" data-source="post: 79906" data-attributes="member: 1917">Re: IQ speakersAnd any pro will understand the merit of standardising all cables with the same connector.Having all normal rj45 you know is not so robust.Half and half is not an elegant solution.There are companies who mod their gear so it is all on powercon or all on IEC. It&#039;s still all electrcity and cable but it makes sense to do so. No use in arguing with manufacturers to standardise on one connector because they still have choices to make. But in this case there is an argument that behinger should use ethercon for ultranet because, why not?!Ethercon on the device does not force a user to use ethercon on their cable. It gives them the choice.But making ultranet without ethercon removes the option for a sound company to standardise their cables which adds cost and forces a less elegant less pro solution when otherwise the whole paclage is very tidy and well thought out.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="James Drake, post: 79906, member: 1917"] Re: IQ speakers And any pro will understand the merit of standardising all cables with the same connector. Having all normal rj45 you know is not so robust. Half and half is not an elegant solution. There are companies who mod their gear so it is all on powercon or all on IEC. It's still all electrcity and cable but it makes sense to do so. No use in arguing with manufacturers to standardise on one connector because they still have choices to make. But in this case there is an argument that behinger should use ethercon for ultranet because, why not?! Ethercon on the device does not force a user to use ethercon on their cable. It gives them the choice. But making ultranet without ethercon removes the option for a sound company to standardise their cables which adds cost and forces a less elegant less pro solution when otherwise the whole paclage is very tidy and well thought out. [/QUOTE]

Verification