Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dave Korman" data-source="post: 80569" data-attributes="member: 1894">Re: X32 Feature RequestsThat&#039;s an invalid argument/flawed logic. A master fader does not have the required physical capabilities to make a cup of coffee.&nbsp; A DCA fader can certainly do what I want - after all, it&#039;s not actually a DCA with D/A converters applying a voltage to the gate of a FET to control the gain of a pre-amp, it&#039;s just a bit of software calculating the effective gain that needs to be applied to the signal. It&#039;s a very simple bit of programming indeed - you just change the logic&nbsp; that you use when scanning the various fader values that are in use on the channel so come up with the&nbsp; effective gain to apply to the channel. Very easy to make it a&nbsp; selectable behaviour. (I&#039;m a software developer and electronics engineer).Just because something has always worked/been done in a certain way is no reason that it should not be done another way in the future.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dave Korman, post: 80569, member: 1894"] Re: X32 Feature Requests That's an invalid argument/flawed logic. A master fader does not have the required physical capabilities to make a cup of coffee. A DCA fader can certainly do what I want - after all, it's not actually a DCA with D/A converters applying a voltage to the gate of a FET to control the gain of a pre-amp, it's just a bit of software calculating the effective gain that needs to be applied to the signal. It's a very simple bit of programming indeed - you just change the logic that you use when scanning the various fader values that are in use on the channel so come up with the effective gain to apply to the channel. Very easy to make it a selectable behaviour. (I'm a software developer and electronics engineer). Just because something has always worked/been done in a certain way is no reason that it should not be done another way in the future. [/QUOTE]

Verification