Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Gunnar Ã…kerlund" data-source="post: 80849" data-attributes="member: 2619">Re: 2.0 Feature RequestOne of my jobs is as consultant to bands playing without their having an own soundman. Sitting now with my first install for such a band I got stuck. The band is now playing on a 03D sitting in a rack with inear senders, wireless and soundmodules. When switching to X32 they wanted to install one S16 in the &quot;effects/mixerrack&quot; insted of a multicable between the X-32 and the rack. They also have a rack near the drummer were they wanted a S16 for the instruments on the other side of the stage. Fine I thought but now when I´m sitting with X-Control trying to make a good setup for the the band I realize that I got problem with the routing. The band wanted their vocalmics together, gitarrs together and so on. But I can´t mix inputs from console with the 2 S16 as I like. This setup is similar to many of my costumerband so I would appreciate a more flexible routing.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Gunnar Ã…kerlund, post: 80849, member: 2619"] Re: 2.0 Feature Request One of my jobs is as consultant to bands playing without their having an own soundman. Sitting now with my first install for such a band I got stuck. The band is now playing on a 03D sitting in a rack with inear senders, wireless and soundmodules. When switching to X32 they wanted to install one S16 in the "effects/mixerrack" insted of a multicable between the X-32 and the rack. They also have a rack near the drummer were they wanted a S16 for the instruments on the other side of the stage. Fine I thought but now when I´m sitting with X-Control trying to make a good setup for the the band I realize that I got problem with the routing. The band wanted their vocalmics together, gitarrs together and so on. But I can´t mix inputs from console with the 2 S16 as I like. This setup is similar to many of my costumerband so I would appreciate a more flexible routing. [/QUOTE]

Verification