Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arik Semagin" data-source="post: 99666" data-attributes="member: 5072"><p>Re: X32 Discussion</p><p></p><p>Question to Joe Sanborn: Just watched your webinar on scaled down X32s: Compact, Producer and Rack. Nice, but does Behringer plan upward expansion too, like to 48-input desk ("Extreme"?). Simple logic suggests that since AES50 can support the channel count, why not add a third input layer (33-48) and full support for a third S16 stage box (mean being able to use all its inputs and outputs). With 48 in and 24 out on stage it may be a hit. I've noticed that many used X32s on the market now (in near-new condition actually) were dumped by small sound companies for one reason: lack of channels (most of local guys that I know went straight to SC48). After initial "WOW" about X32 in general, its channel count was the biggest drawback that made them look at other options.</p><p></p><p>I don't mind having only 16 in and 8 out on the desk itself, but would LOVE 48in/24out on stage. What is the problem? Lack of CPU processing power or something else?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arik Semagin, post: 99666, member: 5072"] Re: X32 Discussion Question to Joe Sanborn: Just watched your webinar on scaled down X32s: Compact, Producer and Rack. Nice, but does Behringer plan upward expansion too, like to 48-input desk ("Extreme"?). Simple logic suggests that since AES50 can support the channel count, why not add a third input layer (33-48) and full support for a third S16 stage box (mean being able to use all its inputs and outputs). With 48 in and 24 out on stage it may be a hit. I've noticed that many used X32s on the market now (in near-new condition actually) were dumped by small sound companies for one reason: lack of channels (most of local guys that I know went straight to SC48). After initial "WOW" about X32 in general, its channel count was the biggest drawback that made them look at other options. I don't mind having only 16 in and 8 out on the desk itself, but would LOVE 48in/24out on stage. What is the problem? Lack of CPU processing power or something else? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!