Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Alan Hamilton" data-source="post: 99720" data-attributes="member: 1799">Re: X32 DiscussionI was just thinking about this today. To a point I agree. But then at some point when X32 sales finally stall enough due to market saturation, and smaller iterations are already out there so I&#039;m not sure how much more market penetration there&#039;d be for any future &#039;mini X32&#039;s&#039;, some bean counter is going to say &quot;Hey... what about a 48 channel version?&quot;. Maybe there&#039;s been resistance to that already. Maybe there&#039;ll be company resistance to that idea tomorrow. But I wonder once sales start declining enough on the X32 if there&#039;s really an option to not go 48 eventually?Of course that&#039;s not tomorrow so anyone waiting on an X48 is probably going to be without a Behringer digital for quite some time.As to those that wondering when 32 isn&#039;t enough.... When you have multiple bands and want neat, efficient changeovers. Of course there&#039;s other ways to skin a cat...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Alan Hamilton, post: 99720, member: 1799"] Re: X32 Discussion I was just thinking about this today. To a point I agree. But then at some point when X32 sales finally stall enough due to market saturation, and smaller iterations are already out there so I'm not sure how much more market penetration there'd be for any future 'mini X32's', some bean counter is going to say "Hey... what about a 48 channel version?". Maybe there's been resistance to that already. Maybe there'll be company resistance to that idea tomorrow. But I wonder once sales start declining enough on the X32 if there's really an option to not go 48 eventually? Of course that's not tomorrow so anyone waiting on an X48 is probably going to be without a Behringer digital for quite some time. As to those that wondering when 32 isn't enough.... When you have multiple bands and want neat, efficient changeovers. Of course there's other ways to skin a cat... [/QUOTE]

Verification