Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Pauly Mel" data-source="post: 65992" data-attributes="member: 2406">Re: X32 - Uli please consider the recording crowdG&#039;day Andrew,No - I understand and accept that fader moves will not be recorded nor would I want that (That I can see anyway <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :-)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" />) - I also understand that a lot of the time I&#039;ll be wanting exactly what you suggest - IE untouched signals straight from the preamp. What I&#039;m talking about is thinks like the compression, EQ, or effects being able to be recorded.A lot of the time, I want (for example) the low cut to be included in my recording chain - or Compression or EQ ... even (sometimes) effects are good to capture at the time rather than trying to re do them later.ThanksPauly</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Pauly Mel, post: 65992, member: 2406"] Re: X32 - Uli please consider the recording crowd G'day Andrew, No - I understand and accept that fader moves will not be recorded nor would I want that (That I can see anyway :-)) - I also understand that a lot of the time I'll be wanting exactly what you suggest - IE untouched signals straight from the preamp. What I'm talking about is thinks like the compression, EQ, or effects being able to be recorded.A lot of the time, I want (for example) the low cut to be included in my recording chain - or Compression or EQ ... even (sometimes) effects are good to capture at the time rather than trying to re do them later. Thanks Pauly [/QUOTE]

Verification