Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jeff Babcock" data-source="post: 66074" data-attributes="member: 46">Re: X32 - Uli please consider the recording crowd+1 - I don&#039;t see the need either.&nbsp; The current implementation is great IMHO - simple and ideal for most circumstances.HPF, compression, eq, and related FX are all very easily implemented in even the most basic DAW.&nbsp; I have mixed a lot of recordings done by other people where I really WISH I was getting the direct, unprocessed signal from the preamp like the X32 provides.&nbsp; Rarely does somebody pre-process something that I couldn&#039;t have done better with had I been given the raw track.Pauly, if you are really insistent on this idea, you&#039;re probably better off picking up a &quot;character&quot; preamp and &quot;character&quot; EQ as your money channel input strip, and just use the X32 as an interface for that channel.FWIW (not much)CheersJeff</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jeff Babcock, post: 66074, member: 46"] Re: X32 - Uli please consider the recording crowd +1 - I don't see the need either. The current implementation is great IMHO - simple and ideal for most circumstances. HPF, compression, eq, and related FX are all very easily implemented in even the most basic DAW. I have mixed a lot of recordings done by other people where I really WISH I was getting the direct, unprocessed signal from the preamp like the X32 provides. Rarely does somebody pre-process something that I couldn't have done better with had I been given the raw track. Pauly, if you are really insistent on this idea, you're probably better off picking up a "character" preamp and "character" EQ as your money channel input strip, and just use the X32 as an interface for that channel. FWIW (not much) Cheers Jeff [/QUOTE]

Verification