X32 Discussion

re: X32 Discussion

What's the difference in dca and a sub group ?
it's like a VCA and a group on an analog console.

a subgroup is a bus which sums the audio of channels - you can eq, compress the subgroup, for example drums-, keys-, voxgroups.

a DCA is a virtual fader for the assigned channels. e.g.: ch13-16 are assigned to DCA1 - if i move DCA1 to +3db, ch13-16 virtually move 3db up but the channel-faders stay in their place. thus also the post-fader effects are afftected. a dca doesn't sum or transport audio - it's just a remote fader for assigned channels.

cheers,
flo
 
re: X32 Discussion

The midi is not a computer-to-midi interface, but a comunication between the X32 and whatever is connected. You can send or receive midi data between the X32 and the outside, but there is no midi through implemented (yet)

Thanks for your reply! I already thought that was the case and it was just for communication, but someone on the forum implied it should work. Great to have that cleared up! I'll go out an buy a seperate midi-interface then :)
 
Last edited:
re: X32 Discussion

it's like a VCA and a group on an analog console.

a subgroup is a bus which sums the audio of channels - you can eq, compress the subgroup, for example drums-, keys-, voxgroups.

a DCA is a virtual fader for the assigned channels. e.g.: ch13-16 are assigned to DCA1 - if i move DCA1 to +3db, ch13-16 virtually move 3db up but the channel-faders stay in their place. thus also the post-fader effects are afftected. a dca doesn't sum or transport audio - it's just a remote fader for assigned channels.

cheers,
flo


Thank you
 
re: X32 Discussion

<snip>.......... and one must rely on ears instead.

There's a new concept for us ;)~;-)~:wink:

When you described the problem at first, I was thinking maybe the trim had something to do with it, that the signal out of the DAW had been trimmed down 12 dB and therefore there was a discrepancy between what you saw in the DAW meters and what happened at the gate.
If you are using a filter key that obviously explains everything. If you are using a bandpass filter with a high Q and a frequency above the fundamentals, the difference can quickly become very large indeed. One problem with trying to meter in a situation like that is that there will not be much consistency anyway due to the obviously dynamic content of the signal and the variation in ratio between the whole signal and the key signal. I'm not sure if metering would be much use in such a situation, it would come down to the ears and experience anyway. Now, I'm not sure when you would use the key filter in such a way that this discrepancy would show up. Gating a drum you would set the filter smack on the fundamental (wouldn't you) and the signal content getting through the filter would be somewhat closer to the unfiltered signal, I would imagine.
When using the gate in a more creative manner, I'd say that the ears would have to rule.

Moving the meters about to suit the application would certainly be a welcome feature for many reasons. I guess we can hope that one day......
One legitimate fear that Behringer might have is that providing us with too many options and functions too soon will lead to an exponential growth in support calls.
 
re: X32 Discussion

Hi,

How are you configuring the XLR outputs to Stereo for 6 headphones? Must all be mono inputs? I have a Presonus 6 channel headphone amp and can run mono lines for 2 Stereo headphones. Each channel on the headphone amp has an added Stereo input also. I cannot find a cable to connect this properly i.e. 2 XLR to 1/4 Stereo plug. If there is such a cable that would allow me to connect 6 Stereo headphone sends until I can get the P-16s. I have looked but cannot find this cable. Maybe special order? I can wait for the P-16s

Hello Tom,

Yes, I struggled with that problem as well. I think you would have to make the cables yourself. The way I resolved it, was to use a Kramer VS-1616a 16 x 16 stereo matrix router that I bought on eBay. It accepts 16 stereo balanced inputs and facilitates unbalanced stereo outputs, all on phoenix connectors. I purchased a 16 channel XLRF to TRS snake and cut off the TRS pigtails. I connected 2 XLR console outputs to each of 6 router stereo inputs, and connected the 16 cut-off TRS pigtails to the 16 router outputs. These pigtails plug into two Behringer HA-8000 headphone amps which, in turn, feed 16 headphone jacks located throughout our studio. The beauty of this (on top of solving the interface cable problem) is that I can route any of my six headphone mixes to any or all of our studio jacks. Kramer makes software that allows for easy router changes via RS-232. I run it on the same computer that I use for X-Control. (An old P4 XP machine). Hope this helps. If you want to make your own custom cables, PM me and I can diagram it for you.

-Jim
 
re: X32 Discussion

Hello Per! As far as I can tell, you cannot assign a specific page A or B to an Assignment button. You can only select the slot itself.
So the only way I can have a direct access button is by having each on their own slot. Once the assignment allows to select between
each page independently, I can then use only the two EQ's for my four Mix Busses. Does that make sense?

Chris

Chris if I'm understanding your post correctly... the way to flip to the second graphic would be to use the arrow key next to the display to get to your "b" graphic
I know it's another "button press", but you would need to press another direct access button anyway to get to mix "2"

Example -
direct access button (5) - gets you to dual graphic A "mix 1"
press the down arrow next to the display "mix 2"
direct access button (6) - gets you to dual graphic A "mix 3"
press the down arrow next to the display "mix 4"

I agree it would be nice to "page mark" the direct access buttons on whatever view you were on to be saved, but I think most people are forgetting the price tag on the console. I just read that someone wanted a desser like the one on the yamaha CL console.... Hmmmm $3K vs $25 K
I mixed my 6th show on the console yesterday, and I have worked around any short comings that the console has presented. Grateful for the product, grateful for the price point, I'll probably by a thrid once the spring hits.
PS - I NEED my S16 snake heads already :)

PSS - stop calling the ID10T issues "bugs" before you flush out that the issue is not standing in front of the console.
 
re: X32 Discussion

The X32 won't connect to Sonar X2 either. It will however connect perfectly to Studio One on the same computer. It proves to me there's a specific communication issue with the x32 and sonar. I talked with a cakewalk tech. And we made sure all the settings were correct, but so far no luck. I don't think it will ever work unless cakewalk and behringer make some internal changes. Oh and I forgot to mention that I tried all of the different control surfaces in sonar just for fun, when the mackie controller didn't work, and it will work for the most part if you set the controller on sonar to the v700c setting. The scribble strips won't read track info. And the bank select buttons react in reverse.

Are you saying the internal FW/USB will not connect, or just the Mackie control emulation? If the 32 channels of audio I/O will not work with Sonar X2 then this board is not suitable for me.
 
re: X32 Discussion

All:
Does the ipad app support scene changes? If so I can't find it.

Also: How does one get auxs 1 and 2 to come up on channel inputs 15 and 16? Is there a way to make that happen without using up an 8 channel block?

Regards to the list.....
 
re: X32 Discussion

Are you saying the internal FW/USB will not connect, or just the Mackie control emulation? If the 32 channels of audio I/O will not work with Sonar X2 then this board is not suitable for me.

Rob,

I had no audio problems at all using Sonar X1. I'll check it with X2 in the next day or two. I haven't tried any control emulation so I can't speak to that.

-Jim
 
re: X32 Discussion

All:
Does the ipad app support scene changes? If so I can't find it.

Also: How does one get auxs 1 and 2 to come up on channel inputs 15 and 16? Is there a way to make that happen without using up an 8 channel block?

Regards to the list.....

No scene changes yet, I think that was one of the things I moaned about when it came out.

To get the aux into a channel, you simply select it in the home/config tab of the desired channel, so select channel 15, go to the home/config tab, and the aux will be around the middle of the source list. (Make sure that the aux inputs are routed to the aux block in routing/home tab)

Now, that wil give you the aux signal to play with on that channel, with a couple of limitations.
You won't see the signal on the recording card on that channel, you still have to record the aux from the aux source.

(The other very minor thing is that you might want to use the input trim on the aux channel to get the signal to a reasonable level, you still have trim on the actual channel, so in most cases you'll be ok)
 
re: X32 Discussion

How does one get auxs 1 and 2 to come up on channel inputs 15 and 16? Is there a way to make that happen without using up an 8 channel block?
you don't need to config them for the 4x8 blocks but can use the routing/home/"aux in 1-4". if you need other inputs with "aux in 1-4" you could use physical aux 5-6 inputs which show up all the time as input source, no matter what you select in the routing/home tab.
 
re: X32 Discussion

Just a heads up, there's an XiControl update for the Ipad app available for download. The Mtx-Main output section is fixed and it seems the app doesn't crash as much. Woohoo.
 
re: X32 Discussion

Hi,

How are you configuring the XLR outputs to Stereo for 6 headphones? Must all be mono inputs? I have a Presonus 6 channel headphone amp and can run mono lines for 2 Stereo headphones. Each channel on the headphone amp has an added Stereo input also. I cannot find a cable to connect this properly i.e. 2 XLR to 1/4 Stereo plug. If there is such a cable that would allow me to connect 6 Stereo headphone sends until I can get the P-16s. I have looked but cannot find this cable. Maybe special order? I can wait for the P-16s

Hi Tom,Do you mean these Procab CAB733 jack stereo male - 2x XLR male 1.50 meter kopen? | Goedkope | Promo | XLR - Jack or these Procab CAB734 jack stereo male - 2x XLR female 1.50 meter kopen? | Goedkope | Promo | XLR - Jack ?

Regards Gerhard
 
re: X32 Discussion

Rob,

I had no audio problems at all using Sonar X1. I'll check it with X2 in the next day or two. I haven't tried any control emulation so I can't speak to that.

-Jim

Thanks Jim,

I am having a really hard time making my mind up on how to proceed. I currently have a Sonar based project studio that has been non-operative for about a year now for a couple of reasons, space and hardware. As for space, I have a 24x36 space with 15 ft ceilings just waiting for me to build out a control room, booths and main room, but without working hardware, it is pointless to spend that money to have it sit empty until I get the hardware working.

My old setup was based on 32 bit OS and a MOTU 2408 feeding a Yamaha 02R V2 via ADAT connection with 24 channels of I/O. I used Sonar as a "tape machine" and editing platform, and mixed everything out of the box with the 02R. When I upgraded to Win7 64, I discovered I would have to buy a replacement PCI card to use the 2408 with W7 64. Also, the pre amps in the 02R really suck so, I had been using outboard pres and all but one of them has developed a problem. (they are over 10 years old, some older) So, in looking how to proceed I have some serious choices to make.

First, I have tried "in the box" with Sonar so that all I needed was an interface and pre's, and it just SUCKS. Proper gain staging for the mix-engine is a pita and the whole "mouse mixing" just feels wrong to me. It frustrates me so much that it takes all of the "fun" out it. Cost to me, roughly $500 US for a Mackie Blackbird to have 8 in capacity. (I already own a Blackjack and am fairly impressed with the pres.)

Second, I can buy the MOTU PCI upgrade card, $300 US, another 2408 breakout box, $300-400, an extra ADAT card for the 02R, $175 and a Mackie 1604 VLZ Pro $900 for 16 decent preamps to D/I into the 2408. This would give me 16 in and 32 out for about $1800 and I could do it a little along, not necessarily all at once.

Option 3, and quite frankly, the most desirable to me is to buy a X32 for about $3000 after tax. However, this all has to be done at once and frankly with paying for a kid's college right now, 3K is a lot to drop at once. However, this option is only desirable if the I/O works flawlessly with Sonar, and all of the "noise on channel" issues have been resolved.

I have played with an X32 the best I can at the local GC, but it is hard to make critical decisions about recording usefulness when the console is hooked to various Peavy cheesbox speakers and there is a ton of noise around. I did like the ergonomics somewhat, and the EQ worked as advertised. Again, it is a lot to drop for something that may or may not exceed my old workhorse Yamaha, but 32 XLR connections on what should be just as good of pre's as you can get for less than $500 a channel is so very tempting to me.

I will have to convince a long-time and loyal customer base that I have not lost my mind by buying a Behringer board. The quality would have to exceed my MOTU/Yamaha setup if I am going to use it. I ran into a similar issue with Sonar Vs. Pro Tools, everybody expected me to use PT but I had to convince many of them to just give me a try and to compare my work to the other locals that used PT. Every client that was willing to give me a shot agreed they would take my Sonar/02R mixes over any of the other Pro Tools studios in the area they had tried, from the $25 per hour bargain hacks, all the way up to the "professional" $150 an hour guys. There is one studio that I consider "real" in our area and he is a close friend of mine that sent me a lot of my clients when he was covered up with larger projects. I am the only person he will refer people to and I can't afford to take a step backwards.

If the equipment can get the job done I am willing to fight the Behringer fight, but I can't afford to take a $3000 chance without some real-world examples/feedback of what this thing can do in a studio environment. I really hope time shows this is a usable board for project studios that do local act level work. I almost bought one a few weeks back but instead re-installed XP 32 so I could work on some mixing projects with my current setup. My poor i5 16 gb memory machine is crying at having it's hands tied by XP 32.

All the info you guys using it to record can give me would be greatly appreciated. Any sound examples made using Sonar and the X32 pres with good quality condensers would REALLY be appreciated.
 
re: X32 Discussion

Thanks Jim,

Option 3, and quite frankly, the most desirable to me is to buy a X32 for about $3000 after tax. However, this all has to be done at once and frankly with paying for a kid's college right now, 3K is a lot to drop at once. However, this option is only desirable if the I/O works flawlessly with Sonar, and all of the "noise on channel" issues have been resolved.

All the info you guys using it to record can give me would be greatly appreciated. Any sound examples made using Sonar and the X32 pres with good quality condensers would REALLY be appreciated.

I am not using it to record just yet, and am also soaking up the knowledge on this thread like a sponge. In response to your woes about funding for an X32, I will say that American Musical has many 0% interest payment options to make this happen without breaking the bank. I don't work for them or anything, I have just used it in the past (and present on other gear) to facilitate having the gear in my hands quickly....

Hope this helps....
 
re: X32 Discussion


Gerhard,

I think the cable you have pointed out is just a "Y" cable. I have attached a sketch of how the cable would need to be wired. I think this would be a good sketch to include in the X32 manual.

-Jim

View attachment Headphone Amp Feed Cable.pdf
 
re: X32 Discussion

All the info you guys using it to record can give me would be greatly appreciated. Any sound examples made using Sonar and the X32 pres with good quality condensers would REALLY be appreciated.

Hi Rob,
I wanted to share a recent session myself and my friends over at Big Blue Meenie Recording recorded for fun to try out the X32.

The whole point of the session was to hear the MIDAS designed mic pre amps and the AD converters on the X32.

How we tracked this session:
Big Blue is a professional studio with a large and well tuned drum room. The mic and Di selection we used are typical mic selections at a pro level studio, so it allowed us to hear what the mic pre amps and converters in the X32 sounded like. We used SM57 on snare and guitars, 409s on toms, 451s on overheads and D112 on kick. The Bass is tracked through a Sans Amp and Agular Tube DI. This was balanced and summed in Logic, with no EQ or Comp. Here is a link to the clip.

*EDIT: Here is a higher quality WAV File via Dropbox:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hsus5ed4vngsy7p/X32 Demo.wav

If you would like to hear any individual tracks, hit me with a PM.

I use Logic personally. As far as using Sonar goes, I see on the thread that some have been successful. We just got NFRs for Sonar to do testing ourselves over the weekend, and will follow up here on our results.

With 32 MIDAS designed mic pres, high-quality conversion, and DAW control the X32 is a great front end for a serious project studio. I think you will also be impressed by the quality of the EQ and Dynamics section, they are very usable for mixing. I can say that the owner of Big Blue Recording thought the mic pre amps and converters sounded really good and even usable in a pro studio. This was remarkable given that Big Blue has 2 rooms with Neve/Amek consoles!

I am sure some others will chime in with their recording experiences, but I thought I would share mine as well.
Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Best,
John DiNicola
Senior Specialist, Product Support
MUSIC Group
BEHRINGER
 
Last edited: