Yes, DCA's or digitally controlled amplifiers are the digital desk version of the VCA or voltage controlled amplifier. VCA's are basically a circuit that uses the output from the fader as a control voltage rather than directing the audio through the fader. This is good as if the fader is crackily it does not have an overly detrimental effect of the audio on that channel. The way a VCA is used in practice is to allow one fader to control multiple faders by using that one fader as a control voltage to adjust each of the assigned channels output levels, think remote control for those channels and you get the idea.Analog desks didn't have DCAs. That came with digital desks (I think). Analog desks had VCAs.
Sent from my iPad HD
What do you mean by ears? We have headphones connected if that's what you mean.
Wireless in ear monitors, especially the oldest sennheiser ew do have problems when connected to a digital desk.
Sometimes we will have output 12 directly going into input 32 for monitoring purposes
Yes, DCA's or digitally controlled amplifiers are the digital desk version of the VCA or voltage controlled amplifier. VCA's are basically a circuit that uses the output from the fader as a control voltage rather than directing the audio through the fader. This is good as if the fader is crackily it does not have an overly detrimental effect of the audio on that channel. The way a VCA is used in practice is to allow one fader to control multiple faders by using that one fader as a control voltage to adjust each of the assigned channels output levels, think remote control for those channels and you get the idea.
Also on the output side, we aux 5/6 going to a distributor which has a number of various devices connected to it, including PC's, amplifiers and FM transmitters. We actually have 13, 14, 15, 16 of our outputs for mains (it should be noted that 13/14 are the effects channels that we actually actively use). Sometimes we will have output 12 directly going into input 32 for monitoring purposes (I've disconnected that as well as 13/14 main outs to ensure that those aren't affecting things).
We actually have 13, 14, 15, 16 of our outputs for mains (it should be noted that 13/14 are the effects channels that we actually actively use).
Yes, common on DJ mixer crossfaders and on high end analog consoles as is allows for easier automation.One confusing thing is that a channel strip can be vca controlled via its own fader.
This doesen't mean that there is a seperate group of faders controlling other channel strips but rather that the actual fader on a channel strip is constructed as a vca circuit.
One confusing thing is that a channel strip can be vca controlled via its own fader.
This doesen't mean that there is a seperate group of faders controlling other channel strips but rather that the actual fader on a channel strip is constructed as a vca circuit.
What efx are you guys using on the X32 for vocals?
the calculated constant will be 1.41x1.00x1.00x1.00x1.00x0.71x0.71x0.71x0.71=0.35355339.
Oh Per I love when you calculate constants. Every time I pass out and wake up in a cornfield.
Also, I'm keen to see a bug in XiControl Ipad app resolved.
Are you with a little girl in a gingham dress, a tin man and a lion?
Which bug would that be?
Hi Per, Please see my post #5662 on 6th April.
http://soundforums.net/junior-varsity/4393-x32-discussion-284.html#post53728
Anthony
Maybe there's a better way, but what the intention is, is having a single analog input that has the entire mix, post fader that the musicians can control with a single fader. This is important because, for some musicians, all they need is the general mix, and having to mix a bit of this or that is too cumbersome (as long as the sound guy is on the ball). It also makes managing the iphone app easier too. This also helps with our overall mix, as even having a little bit of the main mix going to the stage monitors, helps keep a consistant sound near stage. Some musicians also want to hear their effects as they're applied as well, so it helps with that too.Hey Joseph, I'm curious exactly what your achieving by doing this? Can you please elaborate?
Please try to differentiate between mixbusses and outputs, because I can't believe you have analog output 12 routed via a xlr cable to input 32?
I think you mean that analog outputs 13,14,15,16 are routed / patched to mains LR, and that mixbus 13,14 is used for effect sends?
Wasn't the waking up in a cornfield reference a more recent one?
Maybe there's a better way, but what the intention is, is having a single analog input that has the entire mix, post fader that the musicians can control with a single fader.