X32 Discussion

Re: Pop. crackle and feedback problems

Ok, bad news, the feedback occured tonight, after a factory reset on the scene. The scene file is here: http://www.joesiv.net/misc/SSGRADNIGHT.scn

As it turned out, the mix was a bit bigger than I thought it'd be initially:
- 2 wired mic's
- 2 DI'd insturments
- 1 IPOD through aux in 5/6
- 2 wireless mic's (input 3, and 15)
- some effects applied to the two wired mics' (vocals)
- 2 stage monitor mix's

The feedback occurred about an hour after the band finished, and only the wireless mic' was being used (as is usual for when the issue would occur).

There was no strange bus to input shenanigans this time, it is pretty default really.

At this point, I'm leaning towards the wireless mic's (both shure's, one's a UHF, the other is VHF), or maybe the board... ?
 
Last edited:
Re: X32 Rack

He used it to send a FOH mix back to a channel to distribute to the monitor mixes as a "base line" mix that the performers could then add to. Think "more me, please."
That's exactly the reason, the "more me"... Sometimes we find stage performers don't really know what they need, just what they want. However, if the overall sound is represented in the mix that is on the stage, there is much less neediness, there is less fighting over "I can't hear me over him" and such. It was amazing actually, we were fighting over musicians with loud amp's, and just for a practice convinced them to try having more of their mix in their floor monitor, and less through thier amps, and the difference was incredible. The musicians could actually hear themselves better despite the levels being overall down. If you can get the "mix" in the monitors decent enough, there is much less "more me".

Anyways, that's just from my experience working with my bands.
 
Re: Pop. crackle and feedback problems

Ok, bad news, the feedback occured tonight, after a factory reset on the scene. The scene file is here: http://www.joesiv.net/misc/SSGRADNIGHT.scn

The feedback occurred about an hour after the band finished, and only the wireless mic' was being used (as is usual for when the issue would occur).

At this point, I'm leaning towards the wireless mic's (both shure's, one's a UHF, the other is VHF), or maybe the board... ?

I assume you didn't load a scene after the factory reset, because that would make the reset invaluable...

You could try to connect the wireless through a DI, that way you have a bit of a passive HF filtering avoiding RF coming into the console.

You describe it as a feedback, I assumed it was a feedback. But is it really a feedback?
Did you get it away this time by adjusting anything on the x32?
 
Re: X32 Noisy Cooling Fan

It is a valid procedure in some instances.
I have used it on an XL3 in a large theatre to provide the multitude of zones that were required.

This is also an occasion where I do use the rout back strategy.

However for monitors I wouldn't do it, it looks nice to have a main mix as a basis. But what when you adjust the main mix? the monitor signal will change also...
Also summing say a leadvocal directly from the input with the main mix, could make some nasty sounding because of different eq and latency.
To me it's a matter of not having a good monitor mix in the first place. Try to make a basic mix straight from the inputs into the monitor mixbusses, and adjust / raise the specific input channels of the particular artists. If all is set to satisfactory of the artist, you don't have to worry to screw up when adjusting mains.
 
Re: Pop. crackle and feedback problems

Ok, bad news, the feedback occured tonight, after a factory reset on the scene. The scene file is here: http://www.joesiv.net/misc/SSGRADNIGHT.scn
At this point, I'm leaning towards the wireless mic's (both shure's, one's a UHF, the other is VHF), or maybe the board... ?

Hi Joseph,
as previously mentioned, from Jared Koopman, I would immediately disable send to LR from channel 32 (if this is, as the channel is named, Main Returns). This is definitely a loop:

1. Instruments and mics -> 2. channels -> 3. mains LR -> 4. mainsreturn (chn32) -> 5. monitors (bus 1-3) AND mains (why?) -> 3. mains LR -> 4. mainsreturn (chn32)...

when the loop is picked up by the mics on stage will create nasty results.
these loops are worsened by effects (in general) that's maybe the reason why you can't turn effects on.

kind regards
 
Re: X32 FREEZE

Hey guys, last night at band practice my X32 just froze and although it was still passing audio, pressing any buttons had no effect at all. I was recording on flash drive every song separate and it happened just after I stopped the recording ?? There were quite a few songs on the drive and although it's a 16Gig I was wondering if it could have been something to do with the speed of the drive that caused the X32 to freeze ?!?!?!?! The last song actually didn't record at all it is corrupt ? Very strange.
After re-boot everything was working 100% again even recorded more songs on the same drive without problems.

Just thought I'll share this and if someone has any ideas around it..
Thanx
Andre
 
Re: Pop. crackle and feedback problems

I assume you didn't load a scene after the factory reset, because that would make the reset invaluable...
No, I didn't load back the scene's, I did the reset (boot while holding back), everything went back to zero, and I lost all my scribble scripts, I modified just what I needed (just gain, fader, and some to the mix bus', no eq, routing or anything). Then I saved it out as the scene file that I attached the SSGRADNIGHT

You could try to connect the wireless through a DI, that way you have a bit of a passive HF filtering avoiding RF coming into the console.
That is a great suggestion! Thank you.

You describe it as a feedback, I assumed it was a feedback. But is it really a feedback?
Did you get it away this time by adjusting anything on the x32?
I wasn't there tonight when the issue occured, I helped setup the sound, but needed to leave after the band was done and everything was under control (just the wireless mic was being used). This is what my associate says (he's not a sound person, just an administrator): "Buzz came... Killed master & put back up. Still there. Killed & muted 4, 5, 6. Put main back up, Ok." When I've heard it in past, it was a pop, then a modulating wave would get louder and louder progressively. recently, it was more of a crackle, and the crackle would resonate and ramp to up in levels until it was ear piercing. Tonight, he described it as a buzz, but I'm not sure what it exactly sounded like.

He muted 4, 5, 6, which is interesting, in the past, this wouldn't have solved the issue, ch 4, and ch 5 had effects applied, and they were working fine through the band's set. Something seems to be triggering the problem to occur, we've removed the wireless Xcontrol being an issue, we've removed voltage drops/brownouts as an issue (somewhat), we've removed that ch32 being a problem, we've removed some other strange routing/configuration as being a problem.

However for monitors I wouldn't do it, it looks nice to have a main mix as a basis. But what when you adjust the main mix? the monitor signal will change also...
Also summing say a leadvocal directly from the input with the main mix, could make some nasty sounding because of different eq and latency.
To me it's a matter of not having a good monitor mix in the first place. Try to make a basic mix straight from the inputs into the monitor mixbusses, and adjust / raise the specific input channels of the particular artists. If all is set to satisfactory of the artist, you don't have to worry to screw up when adjusting mains.
I think this is going to come down to preference (as long as it is set up right, not being routed back to LR). If we adjust main mix then yes, it will be adjusted in the monitor, but the main mix isn't the only mix going into the monitor, it's just a portion, usually less than 50% of the signal.

What it comes down to is, where do you put the responsibility. For our situation, we often do not have time to setup our monitors just perfect, and our bands are often swapping members as well. If you swap members, then their preferences will change, I'd rather just adjust 1 or 2 sends to get the new band in workable state, than have to start adjusting across the whole input chain (it's not just about them hearing themselves, but it might be they want less/more of those other members). Bare in mind that we're all volunteers, so we typically have less time to rely on getting it all right before a set. By putting the responsibility on the sound person to focus on one thing: get the mix right for the audience; the band gets' some of that benefit too.

Another benefit is, we're running in a fairly small room (not a large auditorium), so stage volume is a concern. If there is a solo, or an emphisis on this voice, it's nice to have the stage hear that emphasis too (in most cases the electric guitar can fade into the background, but sometimes, it's a more critical member), I don't want to have to turn up that aux send in all monitors, then have to remember to turn it back down, not to mention that I don't even know if I'm giving it too much or not, it's not practical.

For us in our rag tag situation, it's working well, we may not use it in the future, but IMO there is a reason why personal monitor systems' have the main passthrough' on them.


Hi Joseph,
as previously mentioned, from Jared Koopman, I would immediately disable send to LR from channel 32 (if this is, as the channel is named, Main Returns). This is definitely a loop:

1. Instruments and mics -> 2. channels -> 3. mains LR -> 4. mainsreturn (chn32) -> 5. monitors (bus 1-3) AND mains (why?) -> 3. mains LR -> 4. mainsreturn (chn32)...

when the loop is picked up by the mics on stage will create nasty results.
these loops are worsened by effects (in general) that's maybe the reason why you can't turn effects on.

kind regards
Thank you Cesare, concen noted, I've completely disconnected ch32 currently, and the issue still persists. In the future I will route internally and disable the LR send.
 
Re: Pop. crackle and feedback problems

This is what my associate says (he's not a sound person, just an administrator): "Buzz came... Killed master & put back up. Still there. Killed & muted 4, 5, 6. Put main back up, Ok." When I've heard it in past, it was a pop, then a modulating wave would get louder and louder progressively. recently, it was more of a crackle, and the crackle would resonate and ramp to up in levels until it was ear piercing. Tonight, he described it as a buzz, but I'm not sure what it exactly sounded like.

He muted 4, 5, 6, which is interesting, in the past, this wouldn't have solved the issue, ch 4, and ch 5 had effects applied, and they were working fine through the band's set.

I think it's getting time to get a different x32 tot test with...
 
Re: Pop. crackle and feedback problems

I think it's getting time to get a different x32 tot test with...

This is what I would do..
Reset console
Induce the problem
Remove inputs one by one to see if the problem disappears with any of them disconnected.
If all you have left is your main l/r output and it is still making these noises, call Behringer support and figure out what to with them.

Or just call them and see what they suggest. :)
 
Re: Pop. crackle and feedback problems

I wasn't there tonight when the issue occured, I helped setup the sound, but needed to leave after the band was done and everything was under control (just the wireless mic was being used). This is what my associate says (he's not a sound person, just an administrator): "Buzz came... Killed master & put back up. Still there. Killed & muted 4, 5, 6. Put main back up, Ok." When I've heard it in past, it was a pop, then a modulating wave would get louder and louder progressively. recently, it was more of a crackle, and the crackle would resonate and ramp to up in levels until it was ear piercing. Tonight, he described it as a buzz, but I'm not sure what it exactly sounded like.

From every description it sounds like a loopback issue, and although we haven't been able to see any except for potentially ch.32 in the scene files, I assume that there are adjustments being made and the scene file is the start point of any one act. In other words, a snapshot of the mixer state when the issue occurs might reveal something new. Is there a possibility that there is a loopback caused by either faulty cabling or mixup of connections offboard? Is there a stagebox that carries both outbound and inbound signals, is there a connection to a hearing-aid induction loop or radio loop that could possibly interfere with radio mikes? An external loopback will typically behave in the way described, because the latency of a digital mixer will make any external loopback sound like a loopback through a delay.
 
Re: Pop. crackle and feedback problems

Does Antoon have a problem?

No. 8O~8-O~:shock:
It was a misunderstanding of my reply. I allready replied to ian.
When joseph is sure he hasn't a feedbackloop build in, I think the easiest thing is to replace his x32. Most people would have gone back to their dealer much earlier.

The only thing that makes me wonder is that with only the ipod he didn't have a problem...
 
Re: Pop. crackle and feedback problems

From every description it sounds like a loopback issue, and although we haven't been able to see any except for potentially ch.32 in the scene files, I assume that there are adjustments being made and the scene file is the start point of any one act. In other words, a snapshot of the mixer state when the issue occurs might reveal something new. Is there a possibility that there is a loopback caused by either faulty cabling or mixup of connections offboard? Is there a stagebox that carries both outbound and inbound signals, is there a connection to a hearing-aid induction loop or radio loop that could possibly interfere with radio mikes? An external loopback will typically behave in the way described, because the latency of a digital mixer will make any external loopback sound like a loopback through a delay.
Very good thinking Per. The simple MP3 test that didn't exhibit the behavior didn't have any monitors active or connected, maybe that's a key point. We have a stagebox, but it only handles outputs, I will verify as soon as I can.

As for settings after scene save, there should be very minimal adjustments made after I saved out the scene files, noone touches anything significant during the mid-week events (even EQ lol) except me, at most it would be mix bus levels, gain, fader levels.


No. 8O~8-O~:shock:
It was a misunderstanding of my reply. I allready replied to ian.
When joseph is sure he hasn't a feedbackloop build in, I think the easiest thing is to replace his x32. Most people would have gone back to their dealer much earlier.

The only thing that makes me wonder is that with only the ipod he didn't have a problem...
Going back to the dealer was the first thing we thought we'd do, but my fulltime job is a software/hardware tester, so my inclination is to find out what the problem is before going to such measures. The thing I'd like to avoid, is going through all the trouble of packing it up, getting a replacement, and the problem still exists.

But I'm close to that. We're going to do 1 maybe 2 more tests. Today or tomorrow we're going to run with just the wireless mic's connected (and active), if that exhibits the behavior, I will throw a DI between them and the sound board and probably run one of our old scene files for some time and see if the problem still occurs. If it happens still, I will drop the wireless mic's in favor of wired for a time.

This is as far as I think I'll go.

I'd like to thank all of you for offering suggestions, and helping me isolate down the issue, it's been invaluable to myself and my church. I think we're very close now.
 
Re: Something positive. For jazz lovers this is gonna be great.

Hi guys and galls,

Something different. Recorded with our beloved X32 and after that mixed in my humble studio. But this is possible!!

https://soundcloud.com/misja-hoen/hari-bo

It's okay as long as i don't mention the names of the musicians.

Enjoy!!
Fun, we gotta get some brass on our stage! Thanks for sharing. I'm just starting to fiddle around with multi-track recording now, what DAW did you use?
 
Re: Something positive. For jazz lovers this is gonna be great.

Fun, we gotta get some brass on our stage! Thanks for sharing. I'm just starting to fiddle around with multi-track recording now, what DAW did you use?

It doesn't really matter that much. But i used Nuendo in this case because i know it really well and i own a license. This is recorded with a X32 but not mixed with it. It's a live recording and transfered to my studio rig.

Misja
 
Re: Something positive. For jazz lovers this is gonna be great.

Reaper is excellent. Very inecpensive as well. And does it's job great. For me it's more conviended to use Nuendo it's where i like to mix in. But that's only because i know it so well.